Snapped Shot

Always Watching the All-Seeing Eye

 
Your Ad Here

Question

By Brian C. Ledbetter · Tuesday, September 19. 2006 09:15
Should reporters who are embedded with enemy forces be treated the same as an enemy?

Here's the dilemma: The press wants to be able to claim impartiality on all fronts, so sometimes they send people behind the lines to camp out with rogue forces. (Sadly, the people they send are typically philosophically aligned with said forces, but I'll leave that for another discussion.)

If reporters know the risk of being on the far ("business") end of Western military forces, why should they not suffer the same bombardment as the enemies they align themselves with? Why should the West not intentionally target them, if they're actively fighting, with propaganda, against the West?

I'd love to hear some reader input on this.
· permalink · Comment (1) · Trackbacks (0)
 
Snap.com Popups

If they're driving you crazy, please click here to disable them on this website.




Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry

No Trackbacks

Comments [RSS]
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

Here is what a handful of random people think about this article. But first, the fine print:
The opinions expressed here, even where approved for display, do not necessarily reflect the opinions of this website, the management, or any other entity or organization, with the exception of the Vast Zionist Conspiracy. Those opinions we represent in style, yo. Please keep the language in these comments clean, as this is intended to be a family-friendly, work-friendly website. Comments not compliant with this policy will be edited for content where necessary. Abusive or otherwise illegal comments will be reported to the proper authorities, up to and including the aforementioned Vast Zionist Conspiracy. The Management cannot and will not be held responsible for commenters making a spectacle of themselves, even if The Management are the said commenters in question. In other words, don't take yourself so seriously, folks. We're all here to discuss the news, and more importantly, to have fun. Now go get yourself into some OCD treatment program—you obviously need it if you actually read all of this mess.

captainfish on 2006-09-19 11:21 #1
*I think we, USA, have always been opposed to seeing enemy propaganda. And, if that propaganda comes from within our own media sources, we see it as a betrayal of our country.

If those reporters just happen to be in the same city when the bad guys roll through and they are able to capture some secret unique shots, those pics are valuable. However, if that same reporter goes to the enemies camp, shares tea, enjoys their sactuary and comraderie, then that reporter's loyalty is seen as to have switched.

Didn't our allied reporters during WW2 get shot at and even captured by the German army? They were captured and imprisoned because they were a member of the Allied nations.

When an american was found to be broadcasting pro-german blather, he was tried and found guilty of treason.

The only way I could change my mind on the object of this discussion would be if he reported back to his company and asked they tell the army where to find the bad guys he was encamped with.
Reply  

Add Comment

HTML-Tags will be converted to Entities.
Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images.
BBCode format allowed
E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA