Snapped Shot

Always Watching the All-Seeing Eye

 
Your Ad Here

Schadenfreude: Associated Press Sharks Attack Shepard Fairey!

Speaking as someone who has been through this particular wringer before, I feel for the guy. Even if I don't buy into his particular form of "theft" art.

Details of the AP attack here—To make a long story short, "We own the photo that Fairey used, ergo Fairey owes us moolah."

May the best lawyers win! (Considering who Shepherd Fairey is, and how much money he's generated over the years, I'm sure he's got much more than a sporting chance.)

Previously: Red-on-red excitement, as Fairey is accused by art critics of "appropriating" (by which they mean: lifting) historical leftist art.

Update: Bob Owens points out that the case is not as clearly "fair use" as one would suspect.

Cue: D'ohbama picture?

Update: A defense of Shepherd Fairey, written by my good friend Peter Friedman.

Update: Allah weighs in.
 
Snap.com Popups

If they're driving you crazy, please click here to disable them on this website.




Trackbacks

No Trackbacks

Comments [RSS]
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

Here is what a handful of random people think about this article. But first, the fine print:
The opinions expressed here, even where approved for display, do not necessarily reflect the opinions of this website, the management, or any other entity or organization, with the exception of the Vast Zionist Conspiracy. Those opinions we represent in style, yo. Please keep the language in these comments clean, as this is intended to be a family-friendly, work-friendly website. Comments not compliant with this policy will be edited for content where necessary. Abusive or otherwise illegal comments will be reported to the proper authorities, up to and including the aforementioned Vast Zionist Conspiracy. The Management cannot and will not be held responsible for commenters making a spectacle of themselves, even if The Management are the said commenters in question. In other words, don't take yourself so seriously, folks. We're all here to discuss the news, and more importantly, to have fun. Now go get yourself into some OCD treatment program—you obviously need it if you actually read all of this mess.

captainfish on 2009-02-07 17:57 #1
*You know Brian, your comment:

"Cue: D'ohbama picture?"

brings up a quesiton. Are you in violation of copyright for even using the image of Obamassiah? Does anyone who uses his image in violation?

Are reporters in violation for taking his picture? I mean, isn't he being artistic and using his poetic license by posing his body in positions to be artistic?

Aren't the leftstream media photogs earning money off of the use of his image? Are they not earning money off of anyone's image?
Reply  

Add Comment

HTML-Tags will be converted to Entities.
Gravatar/MyBlogLog/Favatar/Pavatar/Pavatar author images supported.
Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images.
BBCode format allowed
E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA