Neville Chamberlain Stinks
Your humble host (graphic courtesy dpud)
What did I do to earn such a high honor?
Why, I had the sheer audacity to post an innocuous comment on one of Charles' economic posts that I felt wasn't really grounded in reality. And rather than responding on topic to what I had posted, I was instead invited by CJ himself into impromptu witch hunt.
Who are you linking to? We demand answers, infidel scum!
So anyway, one thing led to another, and before I knew it, I was being pilloried by every last yes-man in LGF's apparently new-and-improved arsenal.
If that's what passes for editorial comment at LGF, I guess I'm not missing much by being kicked out of the clubhouse, huh?
The only thing I regret is that, in attempting to defend myself from near-slanderous attacks, I expressed very strongly my neutrality in the long-past blogwar between Charles and Robert Spencer. In much the same manner as a child of divorcées tries to express neutrality when their parents fight, I reckon.
This, of course, greatly offended both gentlemen—only one of whom really matters here: Robert, I'm truly sorry that I didn't stand up for you more voicifierously when the smears against you were first started.
Charles and his band of merry tag-alongs should be ashamed of their McCarthyite bullying tactics.
(But enough about me: I abhor blogging about blogging. Why don't you share your thoughts now? Unlike LGF, I promise not to rake you over the coals for associations I invent about you, nor will I "ban" you for "attacking" me.)
Update: The official list of people banned by Charles is maintained here. I couldn't find it last night, or I would've linked it then. This is exactly the kind of dictatorial commentary policy that I have constantly said I want no part of over here.

