I have nothing to add to this mess above and beyond what Ace The Brilliant has said. Other than to strongly disagree with Joseph Rago's assertion that you, the reader, are an imbecile. (Really, Joseph! Is namecalling really what the formerly-esteemed Wall Street Journal has sunk to?)
I won't argue his characterization of me being a fool, though. Many thanks to Ace again for the strongest defence of the Blogosphere I've read so far!
:)
We are less hurt by the contempt of fools than by the lukewarm approval of men of intelligence. Luc de Clapiers de Vauvenargues (1715-1747)
Read the incredibly pompous opinion in the Opinion Journal by Joseph Rago and see which category you...