I got my hopes up when I first saw Vinnie's headline CAIR Shuts Down Blog. I'll be honest here: The first thing that popped into my head was, "Sweet! They're pulling the plug on Ahmed's blog?"
Sadly, that was not the case. It turns out that Ahmed (who has taken the time to comment here at Snapped Shot) is actually coordinating an effort to get Right Wing Howler shut down, which has so far been successful!
Ahmed, are these the innocent civilians that you're so innocently defend? If so, we're not amused. I stand with Howler--If the Muslim world wants to be treated with respect, perhaps it should behave in a manner which deserves such respect!
Ahmed, your cries of discrimination would be more fitting, if it weren't so easy to come up with imagery of Muslim children embracing violence
. Perhaps y'all should get your house in order before casting aspersions on the poor, innocent
I'm going to continue posting examples of Muslim child abuse
(yes, Ahmed, inciting your children to behave violently is
abuse!) after the break. If any of you readers have other good examples for me, feel free to chime in on the Comments. (Ahmed, you're welcome to chime in too, as always!)(Consolidated) Update:
It was initially thought that Vilmar may have been taken out of context, but after reviewing the original text (below the fold, courtesy Google Cache), it can be conclusively shown that he did in fact
say what Ahmed Bedier is alleging.
He was goofing off with a parody article
Do parody and satire count as "Hate Speech?" Can it be considered "incitement to violence?"
I don't personally think so, but I'm no legal expert. Any readers care to enlighten us on Florida law here?Nice!
An honourable mention
on IMAO. Thanks, guys! Now... where'd I put the "blush" key?
This topic is also being covered by: Stop the ACLU, Barking Moonbat, Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiller
.Here are my original updates, preserved for full context:Update: Rusty
writes to say that he thinks that the shutdown of Right Wing Howler
would be justified if Vilmar really did
say that all Muslim children should be killed. He also suggested that it's possible
that Vilmar was taken out of context, but considering the runaround that Vilmar has given him via e-mail, it's not probable that this is the case.
Frankly, I'd almost go either way here. If Vilmar was taken out of context, it's definitely absurd to have the website shut down. And even if he did
It is still ironic to me to see Ahmed Bedier bleating about the "innocent" Muslim children, considering the ease by which I was able to come up with examples of such "innocent" children openly behaving in a most non-peaceful manner.Update 2:
Thank Heavens for Google Cache
. Here is the actual content of the article that put Ahmed in a tizzy:
Makes sense to me. After all, if Muslims are raising their little crumb-snatching, curtain climbing, ankle biting rug rats to strap on bombs in order to kill us, it is logically correct to assume that in order to stop that from happening we need to kill all Muslim kids. Starting now.
Hereâs a taste:
As responsible parent and possible future parents, we have to make sure our children donât have to deal with the terrorism that plagues us now. The only way to do that is to kill all the Arab kids.
âIf you support America and children, then you should be for murdering Arab kids.â
Many Arab kids will grow up to be terrorists who will then blow up our kids who will now be adults (but not any longer after they get blown up). If we kill the kids now, they wonât grow up and become terrorists; biologists confirm this. Thatâs why killing all the Arab children is a workable solution to spare our own children. What also helps with this plan is that numerous scientifical studies have confirmed that children are much easier to kill than adults since children are small and weak and donât run fast. Thus, this plan is extremely smart. So why has it not been implemented? Because of irrational beliefs, thatâs why.
Some object to killing Arab children since they think that killing children is wrong. I donât see why people bring that up since that is completely off topic. Weâre talking about making sure our children donât have to deal with terrorism, and an argument about theoretical âmoralsâ only clouds the issue. Save the navel gazing for pretentious college students.
Others object to this as genocide, but only a moron would do that. Iâm not saying we should kill all Arabs; Iâm just saying we should kill all their children. Think before you speak.
The most frequent objection is that killing all Arab children is misdirected since many Arabs arenât terrorists and many are even Christians who seldom behead people who donât deserve it. The suggestion is then that, to spare our children from terrorism, we kill all the Muslim children. Thatâs just stupid. Children arenât âMuslimâ because theyâre too young to be a part of an organized religion. Thus, you canât kill âMuslim childrenâ because there are no such thing. There are Arab children, so we can kill them. Itâs just being practical.
FrankJ at IMAO has the rest.
Okay, so he was posting an article from another blog
, and then endorsing the concept? Eh, I'm not sure what his TOS is, but it's pretty clear that he wasn't completely
taken out of context. What do y'all think? Is this ban-worthy? A lawsuit magnet?Update 3:
Man, I can surely be dense sometimes. IMAO is a parody website
. Which means that Vilmar was participating in parody
, not seriously
endorsing that we start killing all Arab children.
My apologies, Vilmar. You're absolutely not
in the wrong here!Traditional Snapped Shot Pile of Photos
Ahmed, you have any thoughts on all of these "innocent" children? They've obviously been completely
brainwashed to hate
Jews, Westerners, and pretty much anyone
different than themselves. And judging by the amount of weaponry present, they're obviously
pretty committed to violence.
Is that the "peaceful, tolerant" religion you've been trying to tell all of us about?
The Religion of Peace