... by openly admitting that they are biased in their coverage of events in the Middle East.
On the one hand, I always approve of our news agencies acting transparently and admitting things honestly. Yet, on the other, I'm not so sure that our media should really be in the business of "making a difference."
After all, isn't the standard-issue excuse we have gotten for the past 30 years of media anti-Westernism that somehow, they must "remain impartial" when reporting events, so as to be able to tell the story "from a neutral viewpoint?"
Yeah. "Neutral" works just fine for them, so long as you define it to mean "supporting terrorism."
See The Elder's coverage for details. Money quote:
Can you imagine a statement from any international agency professing support for the "Zionist cause" the way that these supposedly objective journalists explicitly support the "Palestinian cause?"