The cowardly John Brennan, the top counter-terrorism advisor to our Socialist President Obama, has come out to praise radical Islam's JIHAD.
He lovingly placates our enemies by calling JIHAD the way he has been told to. You see, it is just a basic struggle to find your inner holiness. It has nothing at all to do with killing of infidels and those who aren't exactly like those in Islam.
I tell ya, I don't know how many times I have become confused each time one of Islam's preacher atherguide call out a holy jihad against this or that. Wasn't it just a few months ago tha they called a jihad against Valentine's Day again?
According to Mr Brennan, I must have been mistaken. That call for jihad must, MUST, have just been a reminder to the good and peaceful followers of Islam that chocolate is not healthy when eaten in large quantities. You see, it was just a health reminder to keep the body clean, pure and holy - sans chocolate. That's all.
He gets even more ludicrous... One wonders if these people truly believe this or if they are just so pissing-in-the pants scared that they will say anything in attempts to appease our current enemies.
During a speech at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, John Brennan described violent extremists as victims of "political, economic and social forces," but said that those plotting attacks on the United States should not be described in "religious terms."
"Moreover, describing our enemy in religious terms would lend credence to the lie propagated by Al Qaeda and its affiliates to justify terrorism -- that the United States is somehow at war against Islam," he said.
Yes, because none of the people committing these "not-nice-actions" are associated with the religion of peace called Islam.
So, the religious zealots that describe their war on western civilization, on the other branches of Islam as well, are not doing so because of their religious beliefs? They are only fighting because of "political and economic and social" forces?
What? You mean our global redistribution of wealth, politics and position is not working? We tried to tell them that USA is not christian but muslim. We tried giving high UN posts to the truly Islamic countries and their dictators. We tried giving them billions and billions of dollars.
And yet, they still feel oppressed by their inequality? Even during this age of progressive socialist policies?!?!? Amazing. What more can we do for them? How low can we grovel at their feet in order to make them feel equal or as kings? We bow towards just about everyone. And yet, John Brennan the top counter-terrorism advisor, tells us that that still does not seem to make a difference.
And yet, we continue to hear and see these honorable victims of a heavy society tell us that they are doing these acts so that they can have favor with their god. Don't they tell us that by committing these acts of non-politeness against us, they will be able to go to their heaven and have sinful orgies with 71 unmarried women?!?!
And like Attorney General Eric Holder's stammering and stuttering, this guy goes out of his way to not find any bad people in the world.
He repeated the administration argument that the enemy is not "terrorism," because terrorism is a "tactic," and not terror, because terror is a "state of mind" -- though Brennan's title, deputy national security adviser for counterterrorism and homeland security, includes the word "terrorism" in it. But then Brennan said that the word "jihad" should not be applied either.
"Nor do we describe our enemy as 'jihadists' or 'Islamists' because jihad is a holy struggle, a legitimate tenet of Islam, meaning to purify oneself or one's community, and there is nothing holy or legitimate or Islamic about murdering innocent men, women and children," Brennan said.
But then he can't quite keep to the pro-Islamic line.
Brennan defined the enemy as members of bin Laden's Al Qaeda network and "its terrorist affiliates."
Wait, I thought there were no terrorists!?!? Oooohh. might have to come up with a quick cover for that slip....
But Brennan argued that it would be "counterproductive" for the United States to use the term, as it would "play into the false perception" that the "murderers" leading war against the West are doing so in the name of a "holy cause."
You see. These people are just basic murderers. This is not a military-focused based action. This is nothing that the military needs to even be concerned about. These common off-the-sidewalk people are just sad little people who are committing murder. That's all. There is no grand scheme. There is no push to "make a point" or anything like that. These are just sad little ... no,.. no, not little as that would make them seem unequal.... sad equalized persons who, do to their UNEQUAL lot in life have succumbed to the heavy-handed oppressive hand of western civilization, have lashed out in the ONLY viable, acceptable way that they can. And that way is to, ashamedly, commit the heinous crime of murder.
Now, before you go there, these person's of equal stature, know that they are committing a wonton and criminal act that will make them lose some position and value in the eyes of their accusers, but you see, they have no other choice. Due to their economic and social depravity, they feel they must in order to just have their meager and pining voices heard.
sniffle. oh, excuse me... let me get this tear that has fallen on to my hand as I write this...sniff
Some of you may recall, that this is the same John Brennan that felt a brotherhood with Islam while spitting in the eyes of dead Israeli soldiers when he said this....
"In all my travels the city I have come to love most is al-Quds, Jerusalem, where three great faiths come together," Brennan said at an event co-sponsored by the White House Office of Public Engagement and the Islamic Center at New York University and the Islamic Law Students Association at NYU.
Now. Whose side do you think he is on?
(you are known by the people you surround yourself with)
(follow-up question: Why does any university allow the teaching of Islamic Law? Where is the ACLU, the Separation of Church-State people?? Isn't that teaching a religion via public funds? How about just trying to teach American law!! For once!)