DMartyr's blog | Snapped Shot

Caves with a view, wide open areas to play and scheme against the Great Satan, communal stoning pits, and, best of all, instant ammunition should a Joo move in next door!

Everything within a stones throw away!

Images brought to you by the Evil Genius at EvilFeed

(Cross-posted at Al Salibiyyah)

Robert Spencer, in an article about self-proclaimed "anti-Fascist" groups attempting to suppress free speech, defends the newest anti-Jihad movement, the English Defense League:

Since everyone who stands up for human rights and freedom against Islamic supremacism and violence is branded a racist nowadays, it's useful to look at the evidence. Here is a group that is so racist that it has featured a Sikh speaker, has a youth group that bears the slogan, "Black, White and Brown Unite," and says: "We welcome members from all over the political spectrum, and with varying views on foreign policy, united against Islamic extremism and its influence on British life. Everyone from those whose ancestral roots are in pre-Roman Britain to immigrants just arrived yesterday will be welcomed into the EDL with open arms as long as they are willing to stand up with us for English values and against Islamist hate."

Many people conflate the EDL with the genuinely racist and antisemitic BNP, which I repudiate utterly, but there seems to be a good deal of evidence to suggest that the EDL is not itself racist, white supremacist, antisemitic, neo-fascist, etc. At very least, they bear watching. In any case, these charges are invariably and inevitably trotted out by Leftists and their jihadist allies whenever anyone stands up against the Islamic supremacism that would deny our freedom of speech, freedom of conscience, and equality of rights before the law. After awhile, the wolf-crying becomes obvious.

I completely agree with Mr. Spencer. Although the EDL is relatively new, it should only be judged by its mission and its promotion of unity of all people opposed to the radical, Islamic ideology.

Those who support the Jihadist movement, as well as the ignorant and uninformed in the media, have been quick to label any who oppose open immigration and multiculturalism as "fascist" and "racist". Do not allow such dishonest labeling to influence your perception of truth and reality.

As Geert Wilders so perfectly states, it is not about rejecting individuals, but rather the violent ideologies that some immigrant groups bring with them to, and impose upon, more civilized societies:

(Cross-posted at Avid Editor's Insights and Al Salibiyyah)

From iMaksim.com via Atlas Shrugs:

Visit iMaksim.com for the full sized image.

(Hat Tip: Atlas Shrugs)

Part one of a two part video. You can find the transcript for part one HERE.

Part two discusses how the current Administration has ignored the threatening Islamic insurrection from within our own government:

The Blogshevik has located a compilation of court documents from the Holy Land Foundations trial.

From The Blogshevik:

I will let Clare Lopez, Vice President of the Intelligence Summit and a professor at the Centre for Counterintelligence and Security Studies have the final word:

To be sure, enemy influence within the Intelligence Community didn’t begin in 2009. In fact, the blueprint for the Muslim Brotherhood information warfare operation against the West goes back to a 1981 MB document called “The Project” that was discovered in a raid in Switzerland. More recently, the FBI discovered the MB’s 1991 U.S. Manifesto in a 2004 raid, a manifesto that not only confirmed the existence of the Brotherhood in the U.S., but outlined its organizational structure and agenda in this country.

The dozens of groups listed as associates in that document include a number who’ve succeeded in forging close relationships inside the structures of U.S. national security. One of them is the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA, another unindicted co-conspirator in the HLF trial). The FBI itself has maintained a longstanding liaison relationship with ISNA officials and placed ads in its monthly publication seeking Muslim applicants to become agents. A top FBI lawyer named Valerie Caproni joined senior ISNA official Louay Safi on a 2008 panel discussion at Yale University for a discussion entitled “Behind the Blindfold of Justice: Security, Individual Rights, & Minority Communities After 9/11.” Worse yet, in the wake of the horrific November 2009 military jihad assault at Ft. Hood that took fourteen lives and left dozens injured, it was revealed that Louay Safi was at Ft. Hood providing seminar presentations about Islam to U.S. troops about to deploy to Afghanistan. That’s an amazing record of successful penetration. And it’s just the tip of the iceberg.

(Cross-posted at Al Salibiyyah)

At a ceremony at the White House on Tuesday, First Lady Michelle Obama announced the launch of the ‘Let’s Move’ campaign to end childhood obesity in the United States, an epidemic she said is costly and a threat to national security.

Obesity is a threat to national security? And here all this time I've been worried about TERRORISTS, when I should have been looking out for the fat kid next door!

Someone needs to do something to stop this threat! Oh, wait! Barack Hussein is on the job:

The ceremony, attended by many officials of President Barack Obama’s cabinet, followed the signing earlier in the day of a presidential memorandum establishing a task force to study the problem and make recommendations after 90 days.

So... I guess this 'task force' will recommend something other than 'eating healthy' and 'plenty of exercise'? Must be much more if it takes a whole 'task force' and 90 days!

“This isn’t like a disease where we’re still waiting for a cure to be discovered – we know the cure for this,” Obama said. “This isn’t like putting a man on the moon or inventing the Internet. It doesn’t take some stroke of genius or feat of technology.

WTF? So, we are going to pay a whole 'task force' for 90 days to tell us what we already know? This is crazy. How many jobs will this 'task force' create or save (other than their own)? At a time when American's are hurting, when the national debt is out of control, Barack is using hard-earned taxpayer money to fund his wife's pet projects.

It's nice to see Washington still has money to blow.

**sigh**

Trick question! Liberals don't know how to debate!

But it took three to avoid addressing any real issues about Sarah Palin. Although Pam Geller raised valid issues, the best Joy Behar, Ron Reagan, and Stephanie Miller could do was hurl petty, childish insults at Sarah Palin and make cliterectomy jokes at the expense of suffering women.

See for yourself:

Pam still kept her cool and, in spite of the gang up against her, managed to expose even more liberal hypocrisy and venom.

Read more at Atlas Shrugs.

(Cross-posted at Al Salibiyyah and Avid Editor's Insights)

...the ones who aren't Racists, Rightwing Extremists, or simply "un-American" citizens, of course.

The rest just dislike the Obamessiah only because they support terrorists:

In an oped in USA Today, John Brennan -- Assistant to the President and Deputy National Security Advisor for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism -- responds to critics of the Obama administration's counterterrorism policies by saying "Politically motivated criticism and unfounded fear-mongering only serve the goals of al-Qaeda."

So, it appears America is made up of the following:

1) Racists

2) Rightwing Extremists (this category includes Teabag Partiers and Veterans)

3) Un-Patriotic Americans

4) Terrorist supporters

or

5) Obama supporters

So, which are you?

(Cross-posted at Al Salibiyyah)

I'm sure the world knows by now, since the leftist blog-o-sphere has been covering it non-stop, that Sarah Palin wrote notes on her hand for her Tea Party speech Saturday night. (Oh, the humanity!!)

As Founding Bloggers notes, via the Gateway Pundit, it's just a silly observation which serves no purpose but to open a floodgate of misogynistic jokes about 'hand jobs'.

It appears the left would rather complain about splinters in another person's hand than concerning themselves about the log in their own eye.

Hypocrisy at it's best.

(Cross-posted at Al Salibiyyah and Avid Editor's Insights)